In the world of high volume printing there are a lot of different ways to get an image onto a piece of paper. So many that it can be hard to keep them separate. In some cases, like the very popular offset lithography, they’re really pretty complicated. Plates, blankets, ink trains, etc. in addition to the paper and ink. When you actually think about how much stuff is required to just print an image, it really starts to seem silly.

So when you see inkjet in action it’s hard not to see it as the obvious ultimate solution to the problem of putting ink on paper. You have ink, you spray it on the paper, and you’re done. What could be simpler?

Well, just about anything else. The drops of ink you’re spraying onto that sheet of paper are very, very small and you have to spray a hell of a lot of them to get an image that looks good. No wonder it took us until the last decade or so to figure it out.

Companies like Kodak, Oce, and HP are making headway and now HP has announced that they are creating a 30-inch wide inkjet web press. To date this is the closest thing to an inkjet replacement for a traditional web fed offset press. It won’t be available until late ’09 at the earliest, but this is still fascinating for three reasons.

Disruptive innovations come from outsiders

The best potential replacement for offset was developed by a company with zero experience in offset. In his “How to drive your competition crazy” video Guy Kawasaki tells a story about the guys who used to mine ice in mountain lakes. They weren’t the guys who invented the ice making machine. The ice-making machine guys weren’t the ones who developed the refrigerator. The point of all this is that new, disruptive technologies are almost by definition developed by folks outside of the industries they end up dominating. HP fits that mold. As someone who’s got responsibility for coming up with ways to break this rule, it’s very interesting to me.

The timing and strategy of HP’s announcement

Second is the timing. Drupa, the graphics industry’s largest trade show, held in Germany every 4 years, is in May. HP announced this new web press on March 10th. There is speculation (leaked by HP?) on the price of the system and its expected availability. Price aside the system looks to stomp the competition, but it’s about also about half the price. You can read Andy Tribute’s excellent article on the subject here.

So, you’re HP and you’ve got this new product that you’re just sure is going to clobber the competition. You’ve got the biggest chance in four years to make a splash. Why not announce it?

• You’re poisoning the market. Who’s going to buy a multi-million dollar inkjet press of any brand with the new HP model on the horizon? I think this could be the difference between an inkjet-buying Drupa and an inkjet-shopping Drupa. This will probably also affect sales of HP’s non-inkjet Indigo presses.
• What if you end up pulling a Microsoft and releasing the product in 2012 for $6 million a copy instead of the expected $2.5million? How will you win back the folks who were forced to buy from others when your gizmo didn’t make it to market?
• You’re giving your competition 18 months to react. 18 months might not seem like much time but you can bet that Kodak and Oce have competing products in the works, or are working on ways to make their existing products cheaper and more effective, or both.  18 months is a lot of time to adjust plans.

I’m guessing that the market for multi-million dollar inkjet presses must be small enough that HP figures their best chance of getting in is to take the risks, make the announcement and get folks to wait until their press is available. Kodak and Oce are depending on the sales of their new presses to fund development to stay in the game. If HP can halt their sales they’ll likely halt their ability to develop countermeasures to HP’s new press.

The scary speed of inkjet evolution

When I left engineering in 1998 to be product manager of finishing products, the inkjet printers that could print at 400 ft/minute had a hard time matching the print quality of a grocery store cash register tape. It was ok for an address or a simple message, but even changing fonts (they were not dynamic) was not easy. You could print in any single color you want, as long as it’s black or red.

There were also printing systems based on desktop inkjet cartridges that were used to address envelopes and the like, but they were slow, not very reliable and the quality was not much better.

Scitex later came out with their 9” wide four-color system, and it was pretty cool but expensive and slow.

Here we are 10 years later and HP says they have a press 30” wide, perfecting, and 400 feet per minute.

At some point the increasing speed and quality of inkjet will cross the needs currently placed on offset, and we’ll see wholesale replacement of offset presses. In general the forecast for printed items is that they’ll be smaller, more targeted and more often in color, and those play to inkjet’s strengths.

Right now a 36” wide offset web press printing 1400 fpm is about $5 million, with a folder. For that same money you get two 30” presses printing at 400fpm with no (or at least severely reduced) make ready. But, no folder, and limitations on both print quality and compatible papers.

I don’t think inkjet is there yet, but I don’t think it’s too many models away.

Kip Smythe, the MC here at Print Outlook just announced that tonight’s reception was not in the adjacent room as we’d been told, but instead it was on the penthouse of the hotel. 

Someone yelled “Do the windows open?”

I guess folks feel today’s presentations were full of bad news 8-)

I never thought I’d see the day when printing got too hip, but I think we may be there. Just kidding. Actually, none of my table-mates at lunch here at Print Outlook ‘08 had seen any of these videos. 

I watched the “I love PIA/GATF” video earlier today, and I think the printing industry has probably now exceeded at least a few other industries in terms of hipness. It started with Pazazz Printing’s video that was campy but genuine and (with regard to printing) original.

Now we have another video. Longer. Less genuine. Less original. While I think it’s great that another printing industry player is gutsy enough to make another video, I think it’s maybe time to suggest a few guidelines to all those folks who are writing the next printing industry video:

1. Foul language is no longer shocking or funny. Bleeping it out actually makes it more obtrusive. Even Mike’s joke about foul language seemed a bit worn. 

2. We’ve got one guy spreading ink on his toast and another kissing his printing press and sun-bathing under a UV dryer. Nobody is going to demonstrate a love of printing more than that. How about loving quality? Or customers? Or binding?

3. Less than four minutes long. At least no more than six.

4. We all love funny stuff, and what works best on YouTube is funny stuff. What’s really funny is something that people in any industry will understand. Even those yet to enter industry. A group of non-printers at my home roared at the scene in Pazazz’s video where the father asks the son if he’s done his printing exercises yet, and the son’s head drops out of embarrassment. Who hasn’t been nagged by their over-zealous parents to embrace one silly thing or another?

I hope we’ll see more videos. I hope we’ll see enough videos that folks outside of printing are talking about them, and see printing not as a dinosaur industry but a critical industry that’s in touch with current times.